AD:MGE
CONFIDENTIAL
کر سم
DROIT
Colonial Secretary's Office.
Dương Phong.
25th April, 1940.
Dear Caine,
In connection with the recommendations
in your Taxation Committee's report regarding royalties
from Hong Kong public utility companies, you are no
doubt already aware that the arrangements with the
Telephone Company have now been incorporated in an
amending Ordinance. The Gas and Electricity Companies,
however, present more difficulty as, with the exception
of the China Light, they show little inclination to
negotiate and the large increase in the cost of coal
has given them a handle to threaten increased charges
to the consumer so that I am afraid the imposition of a
royalty would be an opportunity for laying any such
increase at the door of Government.
Though the times are therefore not
It
propitious I hope to be able to go on with the matter
and I have written to Shanghai for details of the
royalties paid to the Shanghai Municipal Council.
would be of assistance if you would be so good as to
let me know whether there is any Colonial legislation
regarding the imposition of royalties on existing public
utility companies.
One point of importance is the question of
domicile of the company and residence of the directors. As you are aware that was one of the problems which
Page
من
૪ END
Page
confronted Government in connection with the old
Telephone Company before the creation of the existing
Hong Kong Telephone Company in 1925, the Telephone Ordinance making provision accordingly. The Hong Kong and China Gas Company resembles the old Telephone Company in possessing an expensive London directorate.
I am asking for information on these
points so that we may know beforehand what can be
done by legislation in the event of any companies
refusing to negotiate or of such negotiations failing..
Yours sincerely,
S. Caine, Esq.,
Colonial Office,
LONDON.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.